MaplePrimes Commons General Technical Discussions

The primary forum for technical discussions.
While trying to install Maple 10(Single User), after the initial install everywhere finishes, during the screen with the Maple 10 Spash I get an "This Application has Unexpectedly Quit" Invocation of this Java Application has caused an InvocationTargetException. This application will now exit. (LAX) Details are: java.lang.NullPointerException at ZeroGga.a(DashoA8113) at ZeroGga.a(DashoA8113) at ZeroGfs.a(DashoA8113) at com.zerog.ia.installer.AAMgr.a(DashoA8113) at com.zerog.ia.installer.Main.d(DashoA8113) at com.zerog.ia.installer.Main.a(DashoA8113) at com.zerog.ia.installer.Main.main(DashoA8113)
I wonder why the "asympt" doesn't expand the BesselI right!! Is there another way to exapnd it without using "asympt"
Boston publishing company is seeking reviewers for the technical evaluation of Maple 10 algorithms. These algorithms will serve as interactive math tutorials for a premiere college-level student Web site. Experience using Maple, Mathematica or MathCAD is required. A strong mathematics background is preferred. All work will be completed online using a PC. The term of the contract is approximately 15 hours per week for 6 months.
I have been using solve in Maple 9.5 to solve a system of equations with a very large solution (90,000 terms provided in about 10 mins). Access to Maple 9.5 was unvailable so I used Maple 9; I gave up waiting after several hours and seeing memory use go up to 1Gb. Is there a big difference in the coding to explain this. Also, I don't yet have Maple 10; does it have any further improvements?
One of the good things about Maple 10 is if I type > f_max:=10; then max is written as a subscript of f; and the variable f_sub_max is asssigned the value 10. However, there is problem with this syntax. One assigned > f_max:=10; I can not use f as a variable name. Is there any solution to the problem? I like the varaible names with subscripts rather than underscore.
I am a graduate student in Amir kabir University in Iran, I am in desprate need of help, My problem is I have a 4D lie algebra,and a metric tensor onfilteredo calculate Ricci tensor & some other things,in maple,or where ever it could be done. PLEASE HELP Me. Sencerely, Fatemeh
I make som calculations in Maple and I get an output like: diff(y(t),t) = y(t) + u(t) Later I export this to Latex but I'd prefer the shorter notaion with "dots" on the time derivative, i.e. y_dot(t) = y(t) + u(t) Is there a way to get maple to output this?
Hi everybody! I have to solve the following PDE (Heat equation), analytically or "numerically" (using a numeric method). My problem is mainly with the boundary conditions, which I don't know how to define: (1) U(x,t)'t = aU(x,t)''x (2) U(x,0) = T0 (3) -k*U'(0,t)x = q (4) -k*U'(d,t)x = h*(U(d,t)-T1) when a, TO, T1, k, q, d, and h are all constants! pay attention that the conditions (3) and (4) are on the derivative of U ! Thanks (: RedFox.
The original orthonomalization procedure of Gram-Schmidt is numerical not stable. Therefore my question: Is the procedure which is implemented in Maple (Linear Algebra) the original Gram-Schmidt procedure or the modified Gram-Schmidt procedure, which is numerical (more) stable. Thanks in advance, Wolfgang
Maple seems to change from italic to normal font when I edit a command. This results in unrecognizable parameters. For example, putting the "1" in "p1" after the following command had been typed in, resulted in an error message: implicitplot3d([p1, p2], x=-7..7,y=-7..7,z=-7..7); Error, missing operation implicitplot3d([p 1, p2], x=-7..7,y=-7..7,z=-7..7); (p 1 being pointed out, and the 1 being non-italic.) Note: p1 and p2 were defined prior to the above command as: p1:=x+y+z = 1; p2:=x+z = 0; Why is this happening, and how can it be avoided?
Maple displays a defined procedure (yours or Maple's)as output when you enter definition or when you execute eval(
Hi all, I'm currently using the diffalg package to eliminate unknown signals and use the known ones for diagnosis (fault detection). At the moment, I have generated a lot of smaller equation systems from the large one I'm trying to diagnose. However, I get a lot of equation systems (too many to solve all of them), some goes very quickly to solve, others take a loooong time (too long for my poor computer). My question is, is there a way to "rank" the equation systems so I can start with the ones that have the highest probability to solve (other than the obvious number of equations in them)

After installing the critical security updates for Windows 2003 (August Bulletin) I've found that Maple 10 will no longer start. The splash screen appears though there is no progress bar. The splash screen (mws32.exe?) eventually dissapears silently leaving behind an orphaned maplew.exe.

Has anyone else had a similar experience with these updates?

Note: Classic Maple 10 starts with no problems.

According to the helpfile, the syntax for using the command ReplaceChild in the XMLTools package is ReplaceChild(spec, XMLtree) where spec is an equation which is acceptable to subsop(). However, when I try to do this: XMLTools:-ReplaceChild( [1,1]="foo", doc); where doc is an XMLtree I have previously defined, I receive this error message: Error, (in ReplaceChild) child position must be specified as a positive integer, but received [1, 1]. Sounds like yet another oversight in XMLTools.
I'm in the process of manipulating Maple worksheets (both Classic .mws and Standard .mw formats) blindly from the command line. There are a surprising number of stumbling blocks in Maple that make this work difficult. While I've managed to worm my way around them one by one, I thought I'd take some time to just voice my frustration so that others are aware of these pitfalls.

I should note that I am using Maple 10.02 on a Gentoo Linux machine, feeding my commands into Maple through a standard pipe. I would update to Maple 10.04, but the updater program from the website continues to cause problems with Java. Another complaint? That might as well be...
First 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 Last Page 67 of 79