All numeric BVP methods that I'm aware of, including shooting, require you to use some finite value in place of infinity.

Having solved many BVPs are this sort (nanofluid related) in the past, I know that the independent variable is eta. But that may not be apparent to other readers.

You will need to supply numeric values for Nt, Nb, Pr, Le, and M for every solution attempt.

@kristavaldes I'll be happy to provide more help when you have more information. 

@kristavaldes I may be missing something here, but I don't understand how it's possible to recover m from three (or any number of) remainders of m^e without knowing the decryption exponent d. Theoretically, it should only be possible to recover m^e from its remainders.

It's not surprising that homework assignments are given by text message these days, but this is a surprising example of that.

Are you using Maple 17 or Maple 2017? Those are different versions, with the latter being later.

@vv I strongly suspected that, but I didn't test.

I'd recommend Iterator:-PartitionFixedSize, but it has a bug. Even the example on its help page, (12,5), is wrong.

I assume the e is the encrpytion exponent. It think that it's unlikely to be 3 in a secure implementation, although 3 is sometimes used because there is some efficiency benefit to using a small e. A common choice is e = 2^16+1, which is still quite small compared to the other numbers used.

I don't think that your worksheet provides enough details to answer your Question. Could you restate the Question using the language of this webpage: https://www.di-mgt.com.au/crt_rsa.html

@Lottie Just because you're "not familiar with" with a concept, does that mean that you shouldn't use it? Isn't there some room for learning a new concept? The procname could be replaced by Q itself, and the _passed could be replaced by args or A, but the quotation marks can't be replaced. I think that the quotation marks are what scare you. I'll admit that the quotation marks are a difficult thing to learn, but this particular usage of them---to make a procedure return unevaluated when it's passed nonnumeric arguments---is very standard. 

@Lottie The purpose of procedure Q is to defer the evaluation of the expression Q(A) (which is needed in the animate command) until numeric (realcons) values are supplied for A. Those values will be supplied by animate due to its argument A= 2..3. When a numeric value is given, it'll be used to set the parameter A that occurs in the ODE system. Note that there are actually three different variables named A in use here, used a total of seven times:

1. The A in the ODE system and the parameters argument to dsolve;
2. The three occurences of A in procedure Q;
3. The two occurence of A in the animate command.

It's not necessary that the same symbol 'A' be used for these three. But that's a natural way to code it. They do all represent exactly the same thing, but Maple considers them different.

@adel-00 For a parametric plot, the third member of the list that is the first argument of plot must be of the form name=range(realcons). So, you can't have sqrt(Y)= 0..1; you must change it to something like Y= 0..1.

@Carl Love My answer above applies to the general case of an equation in three variables. Since it can be solved for one of the variables, epsilon, as shown by Kitonum below, this is the better way for this case. It's almost always better to solve for a variable than to use implicitplot3d.

@adel-00 The problem is that the contourplot command is not prepared to handle an implicit expression. But implicitplot3d can plot contours, and if these are viewed correctly, they'll look like a 2D contourplot.. So, repeat the same implitcitplot3d, and add the options grid= [49$3], style= contour, orientation= [-90,0]. The orientation makes it look like a 2D plot, but if you pick it up and rotate it, you'll see that it's not.

@adel-00 Please give the expressions that set the  numeric values of the lambdas. I know  that you had those in your separate Question, but that's deleted now.

@mostafaorooji It can be done with coeffs like this:

[coeffs(rhs(ans), indets(ans, suffixed('_C', integer)), 'C')];

This works regardless of the presence of any specific function such as exp. The returned order will correspond to the integers affixed to _C, (which are not necessarily consecutive). If there's any doubt about the order, it will be explicitly listed in C.

A Maple module is a piece of high-level Maple code, essentially a type of procedure. Modules are not stored as machine-language code, and are not stored in .dll files. Some modules may have a .dll file associated with them, but I didn't want you to think that there was an inherent connection between the two.

@vv Huh. I wonder if that's a change made for Maple 2018.2. I still have 2018.1, and RealRange(-infinity, infinity) returns unevaluated. Anyway, I changed the code to accomodate this situation, so please test it.