It works fine for me.

@nm the way you describe, putting the mouse cursor after the word you are correct it does not immediately work. 

As you describe in your ealier post putting brackets and then entering the partial word autocorrect in fact DOES work even without a space before the last bracket.

If I even type the next letter just before the bracket, regardless of a space before the bracket or not, it works.

What you mean is that if you place the cursor with the mouse at that point there is no autocorrect immediately however pushing esc will insert the long_name immediately and if there is another similar autocorrect name you will be given a list. 

@Mac Dude 

What about this little bit of coding http://www.mapleprimes.com/posts/126570-Gridlines-In-3d-Space

Also for each cut we loose 1/16" to 1/8" (the blade width)

Our last calculated piece comes out exactly at 84" but we have to make 3 cuts which would make our last piece at minimum 3/16 of an inch too short.  We will have to factor that into our application somehow.

**added** easily enough, we just add the 1/8" length (actually 1/4" - two cuts per piece) to each piece we need to cut

@Carl Love Excellent!  Thanks.

Mitered corners 45 degrees, so usually add double the width of the casing per side, but that's if the framing is right at the inside edge of the frame.  Casing usually 1-1/2" so we would need to add 3" to every piece.

BinPacking1D(7*12, [[45, 4], [23, 6], [75, 4], [35, 2], [19, 2], [33, 4]]);

Luckily still only need 11 pieces so we don't need to go out and buy an extra piece :)

Is anyone able to come up with anything like this in Maple?

The challenge now, then, I suppose is to produce all those animations strictly within Maple.

Thanks for the replies.

How about the negative sign in the symbolic manipulation.  Maple's output of

can we manipulate Maple's output to show

?

I thought   ln(1/x) = -ln(x) ?  # x=b/(c-a)

I suppose lexicographical order has something to do with this.

Maple evaluates the set {d,c,f,e,g,a,b} to

which might partially explain moving the -a to the front   ln( b / (-a + c) )  since if we evaluate (nevermind the ln) b/(a-c)  maple gives us exactly that .. b / (a - c)

@jonlg 

Not near Maple right now but plot each one under a variable with desired symbol.

ie/

with(plots):
a:=poinplot(data,connect=true,symbol=circle)
b:=pointplot(data,connect=true,symbol=box)
c:=pointplot(data,connect=true, symbol=diamond)

display(a,b,c)

@Jazen1 The palettes are not hidden they are merely out of the way.  You can keep them open if you want.  The default is to have them out of the way to create a bigger workspace. 

Ironically I believe after installing Maple 18 it starts with the palettes open.  People are often confused with software they just start using.

Yes your best option is to change your system screen resolution.

Just a s a side note, I see Maple has not yet a way to orient the values in a plot other than horizontal.  I think as soon as they get that into the software we can have x axis angling.. (ie long x axis labels won't collide with one another)

I agree with a lot of the points being made. Maple is constantly improving it's performance with every new release.  With large scale computing it can be a little memory intensive.  The FEA added by mathematica is nice but the one big problem I have with Mathematica is that a lot of it's internal code is hidden from the user.  I could easily see Maple adding FEM / FEA at the top level as a new package which would be nice, there are some old user created FEM applications in the application center.

Without showing how you got to the results it would be difficult to verify your claim.