This is impossible for a single function surface.  Piecewise functions make things un-impossible.

Are we saying we can't create a klein bottle (or boys surface) in Maple without obstructions in the way?

An explicit maple example would be helpful (I hate theorems)

Or if someone were to show boy's or the klein surface in maple without crossing surfaces would be even better.

The tricky part I suppose is trying to show it in Maple

An explicit maple example would be helpful (I hate theorems)

Or if someone were to show boy's or the klein surface in maple without crossing surfaces would be even better.

The tricky part I suppose is trying to show it in Maple

Just a quick question.  Is month 0 Jan? then month 11 is Dec.  and month 12 is also Jan then. 

I think you just solve separately.  One at x(0)=0 then use another dsolve for the x(0)=1 condition.

I don't think you can use dsolve to solve multiple initial conditions simultaneously.

Okay found it.  Similar but not at all the same.  I was recalling the chinese shadows graphic from this question here
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/127088-Creating-A-2D-Plot-From-A-3D-Plot

While it is not exactly the same shape, it jogged my memory that maybe it was.   Luckily didn't have to search long to answer that question. 

Okay found it.  Similar but not at all the same.  I was recalling the chinese shadows graphic from this question here
http://www.mapleprimes.com/questions/127088-Creating-A-2D-Plot-From-A-3D-Plot

While it is not exactly the same shape, it jogged my memory that maybe it was.   Luckily didn't have to search long to answer that question. 

Curiously I am vaguely recalling a post with a similar graphic to the above but the topic evades me at the moment.  Can't recall if it had to do with transparency or not but the graphic looks quite familiar or similar at least.

Curiously I am vaguely recalling a post with a similar graphic to the above but the topic evades me at the moment.  Can't recall if it had to do with transparency or not but the graphic looks quite familiar or similar at least.

How can we plot with openings?

How can we plot with openings?

how is this bus character still spamming

Well it was worth a quick try.  For something like x^4 + y^(1/2) the plot carries undefined values which causes it then to choose implicitplot3d and create a graph nothing like what it should look like.

Well it was worth a quick try.  For something like x^4 + y^(1/2) the plot carries undefined values which causes it then to choose implicitplot3d and create a graph nothing like what it should look like.

implicit=true is a good idea.  As you say to what extent does maple have to keep looking for alternative coordinate systems.  But also to what extent do we have to keep adding commands to suite our needs (no offense intended).

However, that is a nice question Jakubi asks at the end.  If adaptive mesh is used for implicitplot3d why too isn't it automatically available for plot3d?