Kitonum

21952 Reputation

26 Badges

17 years, 314 days

MaplePrimes Activity


These are answers submitted by Kitonum

After the asymptotes found you build them together with the  original function on the same plot.

Example.

with(Student[Calculus1]):

Asymptotes(1/(x-3)+2*x, x);

plot([1/(x-3)+2*x, 2*x, [3, t, t = -10 .. 20]], x = -2 .. 7, -10 .. 20, color = [red, black, black], thickness = [2, 1, 1], linestyle = [1, 2, 2], discont = true);

 

 

P:=proc(`%`)

end proc;

Error, cannot use environment variable `%` as a parameter in procedure P

In one command line:

plot([2, 5, seq(k, k = 2.05 .. 4.95, 0.1)], x = -2 .. 6, -2 .. 6, color = [red, "DarkGreen", "LightBlue" $ 30], thickness = [6, 5 $ 31], gridlines = true);

 

 

In your example incorrect syntax. The name  f(x)   should be assigned  to  the expression  x^2+1 .  Then all works. The maximum value of this expression can be found exactly (not approximately) by  maximize  command:

f(x) := x^2+1;

Xmax:=maximize(f(x), x=0..10);

plot(f(x)/Xmax, x=0..10);

For  b=0.1  the problem can easily be solved exactly. It is interesting to compare exact and numerical solutions (with numeric option).

b:=0.1:  L:=[seq(x, x=0...1, 1/10)];

dsolve({(x+b*y(x))*diff(y(x), x) + y(x) =0, y(1)=1});

seq(eval(rhs(%),x=L[i]), i=1..nops(L));

evalf[18]([%]);

 

 

Let diagonally for  i=3 .. m+3  as in your example are the same numbers (elements of the list  L ).

Matr1 := proc(m, L) 

local s;

s := {seq(seq((i, j) = L[j-i+3], j = i-2..i+2), i = 3 .. m+3), (1, 2) = 1, (1, 3) = 4, (1, 4) = 1, (2, 2) = -1, (2, 4) = 1, (m+4, m+2) = -1, (m+4, m+4) = 1, (m+5, m+2) = 1, (m+5, m+3) = 4, (m+5, m+4) = 1};

Matrix(m+5, s);

end proc:

Example for  m=5:

Matr1(5, [6, 2*x, 3, 4, 9]);

 

 

According to the problem, the roots must be different. The result may be easily verified graphically. And the initial problem itself also can be solved graphically.

sol:=[m, -3*m+2, -m-3, 2*m+1]:

solve({max(sol) > 0, mul(j, j = sol) > 0, sol[1] <> sol[2], sol[1] <> sol[4], sol[3] <> sol[2], sol[3] <> sol[4], min(sol) < 0}, m);

plot([m, -3*m+2, -m-3, 2*m+1], m = -5 .. 5, -8 .. 10, color = [red, blue, green, yellow], thickness=2);

 

 

You seem to have missed the element  a[4,2] .

The procedure  Matr  solves your problem, for any  m>=0 .

Matr := proc(m)

local s;

s := {seq(seq((i, j) = a[j-3, i-3], j = i-2 .. i+2), i = 3 .. m+3), (1, 2) = 1, (1, 3) = 4, (1, 4) = 1, (2, 2) = -1, (2, 4) = 1, (m+4, m+2) = -1, (m+4, m+4) = 1, (m+5, m+2) = 1, (m+5, m+3) = 4, (m+5, m+4) = 1};

Matrix(m+5, s);

end proc:

 

Your example:

Matr(3);

 

Another example:

interface(rtablesize=20):
Matr(7);

 

 

 

Use the command  Student[VectorCalculus][LineInt]

An example:

 

A:=plot(sin(x), color=red,legend="Sin"):

B:=plot(cos(x), color=blue, legend="Cos"):

C:=plot(tan(x), color=green, legend="Tan", discont=true):

E:=plot([seq([Pi/2+Pi*k, t, t=-3..3], k=-1..2)],color=black, linestyle=2, legend=["Asymptote"$4]):

plots[display](A,B,C,E, thickness=2,view=[-Pi/2..5*Pi/2, -3..3], scaling=constrained);

 

Corrections in the last line and result:

plots[implicitplot]('IC(2, x, y, 1, 1)', x = .1 .. .9, y = -1 .. 1, filled = true, numpoints = 10);

#  or  plots[implicitplot]((x,y)-> IC(2, x, y, 1, 1), .1 .. .9, -1 .. 1, filled = true, numpoints = 10);

 

x := 5.180070098;

y := -8.852276351;

k := 10.25650636;

 f := s->piecewise(0 < s and s <= 2, (1+I*k/y)*((1+I*k/x)*exp(I*x*s)/(1-I*k/x)+exp(-I*x*s))/(1-I*k/y), 2 < s and s <= 5, exp(-(2*I)*x)*((1+I*k/y)*exp(I*y*(s-2))/(1-I*k/y)+exp(-I*y*(s-2))), 5 < s and s <= 7, exp(-(3*I)*y)*((1+I*k/x)*exp(I*x*(7-s))/(1-I*k/x)+exp(-I*x*(7-s))), 7 < s and s <= 10, (1+I*k/x)*((1+I*k/y)*exp(I*y*(10-s))/(1-I*k/y)+exp(-I*y*(10-s)))/(1-I*k/x)):

a := s->abs(f(s));

 plot(a, 0..10, discont = true);   #  or  plot('a(s)', s=0..10, discont = true);

Simplify your code, your functions  f  and  g  are the same. The plotting was done on separate points with step= 0.01.

x := 5.180070098;

y := -8.852276351;

k := 10.25650636;

 f := s->piecewise(0 < s and s <= 2, (1+I*k/y)*((1+I*k/x)*exp(I*x*s)/(1-I*k/x)+exp(-I*x*s))/(1-I*k/y), 2 < s and s <= 5, exp(-(2*I)*x)*((1+I*k/y)*exp(I*y*(s-2))/(1-I*k/y)+exp(-I*y*(s-2))), 5 < s and s <= 7, exp(-(3*I)*y)*((1+I*k/x)*exp(I*x*(7-s))/(1-I*k/x)+exp(-I*x*(7-s))), 7 < s and s <= 10, (1+I*k/x)*((1+I*k/y)*exp(I*y*(10-s))/(1-I*k/y)+exp(-I*y*(10-s)))/(1-I*k/x)):

a := s->abs(f(s));

X := [seq(s, s = 0 .. 10, 0.01)]:

Y := [seq(a(s), s = 0 .. 10, 0.01)]:

 plot(X, Y, discont = true);

 

 

with(combinat):

L:=[1,2,3]:

L1:=permute(L, 1);

L2:=permute(L, 2);

L3:=permute(L, 3);

M:=[]:

for i in L3 do

for j in L2 do

for k in L1 do

M:=[op(M), [i,j,k]]:

od: od: od:

nops(M); op(M);

 

 

In the example I used the same matrices as Markiyan:

with(LinearAlgebra):

A:=Matrix([[-93, -72], [-76, -2]]):

C:=Matrix([[-98, 57], [-77, 27]]):

E:=Matrix([[-38, 87], [-18, 33]]):

Id:=IdentityMatrix(2):

fsolve(Determinant(A-lambda*C.Id-lambda^2*E.Id), lambda,complex);

           -11.36829371, -.3123524009-1.257844764*I, -.3123524009+1.257844764*I, .8872292854

First 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 Last Page 268 of 292