dharr

Dr. David Harrington

8235 Reputation

22 Badges

20 years, 342 days
University of Victoria
Professor or university staff
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Social Networks and Content at Maplesoft.com

Maple Application Center
I am a retired professor of chemistry at the University of Victoria, BC, Canada. My research areas are electrochemistry and surface science. I have been a user of Maple since about 1990.

MaplePrimes Activity


These are replies submitted by dharr

@MaPal93 The conditions on lambda__2 arise fairly naturally from just making sure that there are no zero denominators in the solutions, so I think you just need to first find the solutions and then just look at how the conditions relate to the solutions. Here's my analysis, which leads only to complex solutions  :(

MatrixNew3.mw

@MaPal93 I would suggest complete workup with your calibration system without putting in numerical values for what I called parameters (@mmcdara's "remain" variables). Since the restrictions on lambda__2 are not that onerous, just find when the quadratic equation in Edit: corrected: lambda__3 has real, positive solutions, remove any that don't obey the conditions on lambda__2, and then work out lambda__1 for the OK lambda__2's, and see if/when they are positive.

Maybe this case is simple enough that solve/parametric can do this for you.

Once you understand the calibration system, then you can try some less restrictive ones, where the conditions and components might be more complicated.

@mmcdara I followed only this thread4 (different from the other 4!), and worked extensively on a matrix formulation, but got no response so I lost interest. I know very little statistics, but think that sometimes a matrix formulation can be easier than working with polynomials. Like you, I somehow expect that there must be an easier way, and I am slowly grasping the interrelationships between the different quantities.

This time the matrix Q has a lot fewer lambda's in, and so there might be a better chance of some solutions that are tractable. So I was willing to work a bit more on it.

@MaPal93 Perhaps you can provide @mmcdara with the notes you sent me, or upload them here.

@MaPal93 In the earlier problem, (separate thread), I recall that PolynomialSystems sometimes produced three components, so you had to solve the third, then the second, then the first, whereas above there are fewer "restrictions" (badly chosen word) since you can choose lambda__2 and lambda__3 arbitrarily. Since you are still working on a simpler calibration system, perhaps there will be more components for other cases. Anyway, I'll shortly post a separate answer that solves the calibration system without the denominators problem (and has two components).

@acer Fantastic. Vote up.

@emersondiaz I assume you are talking about the dsolve(DE,...) solution. Your worksheet doesn't reproduce the error you mention (I instead get a message about a singulaity) so I don't know how you got that. So here are some comments:

1. The default method automatically adjust the stepsize, so you should not use the stepsize option.

2. If your equations occur with many diffferent timescales (or rscales here), then you may need a stiff solver - add stiff=true (I routinely use this).

3. Terms in the equations and the numbers you are interested in for r and R are many orders of magnitude away from 1 (10^6 and 10^45 appear with 10^(-31). For example (r^2 - 1.690735000*10^37*r + 0.81). So the equations need to be rescaled (non-dimensionalize would be typical, or use a different unit solution) to avoid these numbers.

Point 3 is the most important point.

@NIMA112 You want now to solve a PDE on two regions with matching conditions at the common boundary, Eqs 6.30-6.33. As far as I know, Maple's numerical PDE solver only handles single rectangular regions. A Tool like COMSOL is probably better suted to this. Or you could follow the procedure given to find the complicated series solution; I didn't try to understand that in detail.

@mmcdara Thanks. Of course I first tried the obvious elimination of all of v,a,b,R,T, which doesn't work. v turns into Z to make the cubic, so I tried that first and made progress. Then since A is a nondimensionalized version of a, and similarly for b I added them and the R and T disappeared because they "had to" as they weren't in the final result.

I use solve more than I use eliminate, but here I would have got a RootOf solving for Z: solve({eqA, eqB, eqP, eqZ}, {Z, a, b, v}).

@mmcdara You analysis appeared as I was working on the numerical solution. Vote up. 

@Carl Love Actually, I wasn't relying on that in the procedure. If it does remember (probably most times), then the loop executes faster, but otherwise it is just slower.

I added a note about it in the worksheet.

@ider I think @sursumCorda's point is that by using a truncation order of zero you only get the principal part and the O() term, which you can remove by convert/polynom. So the following should give the principal part:

convert(series(BesselK(4, x), x = 0, 0),polynom);

You suggested it sometimes stops earlier, which I didn't understand. Do you have an example of that?

(The documentation for laurent suggests some subtlety when there are an infinite number of negative powers, which I didn't follow.)

@dharr Now the full VF2++ algorithm is implemented. Good for relatively sparse graphs but dense ones still difficult. Perhaps VF3...

Notes: It's currently a memory hog. Information about states that won't be visited could be deleted; T1 etc sets could be incrementally generated as needed. But for dense graphs, the VF3 algorithm may be better, since it (dynamically) uses information about G2 to prune the search tree; VF2++'s preprocessing isonly for G1.

Find if G1 is isomorphic to an induced subgraph of G2, using the VF2++ algorithm.
Graphs must be undirected without self-loops.

See VF2++ paper doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2018.02.018 for notation and description.
Code is in startup region (and is reproduced at the end of this worksheet)

restart;

with(GraphTheory):

claw:=CompleteGraph(1,3):
g:=CompleteGraph(2,2,2,2):
#DrawGraph(claw,size=[200,200]);
#DrawGraph(g,size=[200,200]);
IsSubgraphInducedIsomorphic(claw,g);

false

G1:=PathGraph(3):
G2:=Graph([1,2,3]):AddEdge(G2,{{3,1},{1,2}}):
DrawGraph(G1,size=[200,200]);
DrawGraph(G2,size=[200,200]);

IsSubgraphInducedIsomorphic(G1,G2,matching=true);

true, {1 = 2, 2 = 1, 3 = 3}

Snake in the box - see Wikipedia 

G1:=PathGraph(14); # longest for HyperGraph(5);
G2:=SpecialGraphs:-HypercubeGraph(5);
#DrawGraph(G1);
#DrawGraph(G2);

GRAPHLN(undirected, unweighted, [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14], Array(1..14, {(1) = {2}, (2) = {1, 3}, (3) = {2, 4}, (4) = {3, 5}, (5) = {4, 6}, (6) = {5, 7}, (7) = {6, 8}, (8) = {7, 9}, (9) = {8, 10}, (10) = {9, 11}, (11) = {10, 12}, (12) = {11, 13}, (13) = {12, 14}, (14) = {13}}), `GRAPHLN/table/15`, 0)

GRAPHLN(undirected, unweighted, ["00000", "00001", "00010", "00011", "00100", "00101", "00110", "00111", "01000", "01001", "01010", "01011", "01100", "01101", "01110", "01111", "10000", "10001", "10010", "10011", "10100", "10101", "10110", "10111", "11000", "11001", "11010", "11011", "11100", "11101", "11110", "11111"], Array(1..32, {(1) = {2, 3, 5, 9, 17}, (2) = {1, 4, 6, 10, 18}, (3) = {1, 4, 7, 11, 19}, (4) = {2, 3, 8, 12, 20}, (5) = {1, 6, 7, 13, 21}, (6) = {2, 5, 8, 14, 22}, (7) = {3, 5, 8, 15, 23}, (8) = {4, 6, 7, 16, 24}, (9) = {1, 10, 11, 13, 25}, (10) = {2, 9, 12, 14, 26}, (11) = {3, 9, 12, 15, 27}, (12) = {4, 10, 11, 16, 28}, (13) = {5, 9, 14, 15, 29}, (14) = {6, 10, 13, 16, 30}, (15) = {7, 11, 13, 16, 31}, (16) = {8, 12, 14, 15, 32}, (17) = {1, 18, 19, 21, 25}, (18) = {2, 17, 20, 22, 26}, (19) = {3, 17, 20, 23, 27}, (20) = {4, 18, 19, 24, 28}, (21) = {5, 17, 22, 23, 29}, (22) = {6, 18, 21, 24, 30}, (23) = {7, 19, 21, 24, 31}, (24) = {8, 20, 22, 23, 32}, (25) = {9, 17, 26, 27, 29}, (26) = {10, 18, 25, 28, 30}, (27) = {11, 19, 25, 28, 31}, (28) = {12, 20, 26, 27, 32}, (29) = {13, 21, 25, 30, 31}, (30) = {14, 22, 26, 29, 32}, (31) = {15, 23, 27, 29, 32}, (32) = {16, 24, 28, 30, 31}}), `GRAPHLN/table/16`, 0)

t,m:=IsSubgraphInducedIsomorphic(G1,G2,matching=true);
IsIsomorphic(G1,InducedSubgraph(G2,map(rhs,m)));

true, {1 = "00010", 2 = "00000", 3 = "00001", 4 = "00101", 5 = "01101", 6 = "01100", 7 = "01110", 8 = "11110", 9 = "10110", 10 = "10111", 11 = "10011", 12 = "11011", 13 = "11001", 14 = "11000"}

true

Coil in a box

G1:=CycleGraph(14); # longest for HyperGraph(5);
G2:=SpecialGraphs:-HypercubeGraph(5);
#DrawGraph(G1);
#DrawGraph(G2);

GRAPHLN(undirected, unweighted, [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14], Array(1..14, {(1) = {2, 14}, (2) = {1, 3}, (3) = {2, 4}, (4) = {3, 5}, (5) = {4, 6}, (6) = {5, 7}, (7) = {6, 8}, (8) = {7, 9}, (9) = {8, 10}, (10) = {9, 11}, (11) = {10, 12}, (12) = {11, 13}, (13) = {12, 14}, (14) = {1, 13}}), `GRAPHLN/table/21`, 0)

GRAPHLN(undirected, unweighted, ["00000", "00001", "00010", "00011", "00100", "00101", "00110", "00111", "01000", "01001", "01010", "01011", "01100", "01101", "01110", "01111", "10000", "10001", "10010", "10011", "10100", "10101", "10110", "10111", "11000", "11001", "11010", "11011", "11100", "11101", "11110", "11111"], Array(1..32, {(1) = {2, 3, 5, 9, 17}, (2) = {1, 4, 6, 10, 18}, (3) = {1, 4, 7, 11, 19}, (4) = {2, 3, 8, 12, 20}, (5) = {1, 6, 7, 13, 21}, (6) = {2, 5, 8, 14, 22}, (7) = {3, 5, 8, 15, 23}, (8) = {4, 6, 7, 16, 24}, (9) = {1, 10, 11, 13, 25}, (10) = {2, 9, 12, 14, 26}, (11) = {3, 9, 12, 15, 27}, (12) = {4, 10, 11, 16, 28}, (13) = {5, 9, 14, 15, 29}, (14) = {6, 10, 13, 16, 30}, (15) = {7, 11, 13, 16, 31}, (16) = {8, 12, 14, 15, 32}, (17) = {1, 18, 19, 21, 25}, (18) = {2, 17, 20, 22, 26}, (19) = {3, 17, 20, 23, 27}, (20) = {4, 18, 19, 24, 28}, (21) = {5, 17, 22, 23, 29}, (22) = {6, 18, 21, 24, 30}, (23) = {7, 19, 21, 24, 31}, (24) = {8, 20, 22, 23, 32}, (25) = {9, 17, 26, 27, 29}, (26) = {10, 18, 25, 28, 30}, (27) = {11, 19, 25, 28, 31}, (28) = {12, 20, 26, 27, 32}, (29) = {13, 21, 25, 30, 31}, (30) = {14, 22, 26, 29, 32}, (31) = {15, 23, 27, 29, 32}, (32) = {16, 24, 28, 30, 31}}), `GRAPHLN/table/22`, 0)

t,m:=IsSubgraphInducedIsomorphic(G1,G2,matching=true);
IsIsomorphic(G1,InducedSubgraph(G2,rhs~(m)));

true, {1 = "00000", 2 = "00001", 3 = "00101", 4 = "01101", 5 = "01100", 6 = "11100", 7 = "11000", 8 = "11001", 9 = "11011", 10 = "10011", 11 = "10111", 12 = "10110", 13 = "00110", 14 = "00010"}

true

But it is much slower to decide there are no matches when the cycle (or path) is one unit longer.

CodeTools:-Usage(IsSubgraphInducedIsomorphic(CycleGraph(15),G2,matching=true));

memory used=16.95GiB, alloc change=0.53GiB, cpu time=5.50m, real time=3.23m, gc time=2.75m

false

Random low density graph (length of output message here is a bug - SCR reported)

randomize(740472561204):
G2 := RandomGraphs:-RandomGraph(10000, 0.1);
NumberOfEdges(G2);
p:=combinat:-randcomb(Vertices(G2),30):
G1 := RelabelVertices(InducedSubgraph(G2,p),[$1..nops(p)]);

`[Length of output exceeds limit of 1000000]`

4999154

GRAPHLN(undirected, unweighted, [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30], Array(1..30, {(1) = {}, (2) = {3, 23}, (3) = {2, 15, 17}, (4) = {7, 19, 20, 23, 30}, (5) = {12}, (6) = {8}, (7) = {4, 25, 26, 30}, (8) = {6, 25}, (9) = {17, 21, 23}, (10) = {17, 20}, (11) = {13, 21}, (12) = {5, 22, 25, 26}, (13) = {11, 24}, (14) = {19}, (15) = {3, 24, 25}, (16) = {20, 21, 27}, (17) = {3, 9, 10}, (18) = {21, 22, 23}, (19) = {4, 14, 29}, (20) = {4, 10, 16}, (21) = {9, 11, 16, 18, 28, 30}, (22) = {12, 18, 26}, (23) = {2, 4, 9, 18}, (24) = {13, 15, 25, 26}, (25) = {7, 8, 12, 15, 24}, (26) = {7, 12, 22, 24, 28}, (27) = {16, 29}, (28) = {21, 26}, (29) = {19, 27}, (30) = {4, 7, 21}}), `GRAPHLN/table/29`, 0)

t,m:=CodeTools:-Usage(IsSubgraphInducedIsomorphic(G1,G2,matching=true));
IsIsomorphic(G1,InducedSubgraph(G2,rhs~(m)));

memory used=483.58MiB, alloc change=-114.43MiB, cpu time=3.09s, real time=2.59s, gc time=718.75ms

true, {1 = 21, 2 = 1869, 3 = 1209, 4 = 139, 5 = 264, 6 = 34, 7 = 269, 8 = 16, 9 = 5, 10 = 844, 11 = 42, 12 = 28, 13 = 202, 14 = 167, 15 = 346, 16 = 13, 17 = 50, 18 = 20, 19 = 140, 20 = 55, 21 = 1, 22 = 197, 23 = 334, 24 = 190, 25 = 385, 26 = 272, 27 = 144, 28 = 74, 29 = 187, 30 = 29}

true

Random smaller higher density graph is much harder

randomize(22807444796519):
G2 := RandomGraphs:-RandomGraph(50, 0.5);
p:=combinat:-randcomb(Vertices(G2),11):
G1 := RelabelVertices(InducedSubgraph(G2,p),[$1..nops(p)]);

GRAPHLN(undirected, unweighted, [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50], Array(1..50, {(1) = {2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 22, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 37, 38, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48}, (2) = {1, 7, 9, 10, 11, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 27, 28, 31, 33, 39, 40, 41, 45, 47}, (3) = {4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 17, 18, 24, 28, 29, 33, 34, 37, 38, 39, 40, 42, 44, 46, 47}, (4) = {1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 34, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 50}, (5) = {1, 4, 6, 8, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 22, 23, 24, 27, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 42, 43, 49, 50}, (6) = {3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 15, 16, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 29, 32, 34, 36, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 47, 50}, (7) = {2, 3, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 26, 29, 30, 31, 33, 37, 39, 42, 43, 45, 47}, (8) = {1, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 27, 28, 30, 33, 34, 35, 36, 40, 42, 45, 46, 49, 50}, (9) = {1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 17, 20, 21, 24, 25, 28, 29, 33, 36, 37, 38, 40, 43, 45, 49, 50}, (10) = {1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, 13, 14, 15, 18, 21, 23, 24, 26, 28, 30, 31, 34, 36, 38, 39, 40, 42, 44, 45}, (11) = {1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 34, 36, 44, 45, 46, 47, 50}, (12) = {3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 11, 15, 17, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 34, 36, 37, 39, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 48, 49, 50}, (13) = {7, 8, 10, 11, 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29, 30, 33, 34, 35, 36, 39, 40, 41, 48}, (14) = {1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 11, 15, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 29, 32, 34, 35, 36, 39, 40, 41, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49}, (15) = {1, 5, 6, 10, 12, 13, 14, 19, 22, 23, 24, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 41, 45, 47, 50}, (16) = {1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 20, 22, 24, 25, 26, 28, 32, 33, 34, 37, 42, 45, 47, 49}, (17) = {1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 19, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 36, 37, 39, 42, 44, 45, 47, 49, 50}, (18) = {3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 13, 14, 21, 23, 24, 26, 29, 30, 31, 33, 35, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 50}, (19) = {2, 6, 7, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 36, 37, 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 49, 50}, (20) = {1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 21, 22, 23, 25, 28, 29, 30, 31, 33, 35, 36, 39, 40, 41, 44, 45, 46, 47}, (21) = {2, 4, 6, 9, 10, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 31, 33, 37, 41, 43, 44, 45, 48, 49}, (22) = {1, 5, 6, 12, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 30, 33, 34, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41, 42, 45, 46, 48, 49, 50}, (23) = {4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 34, 39, 41, 42, 43, 45, 47, 48, 50}, (24) = {1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 23, 27, 28, 32, 33, 37, 38, 40, 41, 44, 46, 49}, (25) = {4, 6, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 23, 26, 27, 29, 30, 33, 35, 37, 41, 45, 46, 49}, (26) = {7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 25, 27, 29, 30, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43, 45}, (27) = {1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13, 17, 19, 21, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 38, 40, 41, 42, 45, 46, 47}, (28) = {1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, 27, 30, 32, 33, 36, 37, 39, 40, 44, 46, 47, 49}, (29) = {1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 25, 26, 27, 34, 43, 45, 48, 49, 50}, (30) = {1, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 25, 26, 28, 32, 33, 34, 36, 39, 41, 42, 43, 46}, (31) = {2, 7, 10, 11, 12, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 27, 36, 38, 39, 40, 42, 44, 48, 49, 50}, (32) = {1, 5, 6, 11, 14, 15, 16, 19, 24, 27, 28, 30, 33, 36, 38, 39, 41, 42, 46, 47, 48, 50}, (33) = {1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 28, 30, 32, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 42, 44, 45, 50}, (34) = {1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 22, 23, 26, 27, 29, 30, 33, 37, 38, 39, 42, 44, 48, 49}, (35) = {5, 8, 13, 14, 15, 18, 20, 25, 26, 27, 33, 40, 41, 42, 43, 45, 48, 49, 50}, (36) = {5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 19, 20, 22, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 37, 40, 41, 47, 48, 49}, (37) = {1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19, 21, 22, 24, 25, 28, 33, 34, 36, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48}, (38) = {1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 15, 18, 19, 24, 26, 27, 31, 32, 33, 34, 41, 43, 46, 48, 49}, (39) = {2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 26, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 40, 41, 43, 45, 46, 48, 49}, (40) = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 27, 28, 31, 33, 35, 36, 39, 41, 42, 45, 48, 49, 50}, (41) = {1, 2, 4, 6, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 30, 32, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50}, (42) = {1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 26, 27, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 40, 44, 45, 48, 49, 50}, (43) = {1, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 18, 19, 21, 23, 26, 29, 30, 35, 38, 39, 49, 50}, (44) = {1, 3, 4, 6, 10, 11, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 28, 31, 33, 34, 37, 42, 45, 50}, (45) = {1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 29, 33, 35, 37, 39, 40, 41, 42, 44, 47, 48}, (46) = {1, 3, 4, 8, 11, 12, 14, 18, 19, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, 28, 30, 32, 38, 39, 41, 47, 48, 49}, (47) = {1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 23, 27, 28, 32, 36, 37, 41, 45, 46, 50}, (48) = {1, 4, 12, 13, 14, 18, 21, 22, 23, 29, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 45, 46, 49}, (49) = {5, 8, 9, 12, 14, 16, 17, 19, 21, 22, 24, 25, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 46, 48, 50}, (50) = {4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 29, 31, 32, 33, 35, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 47, 49}}), `GRAPHLN/table/34`, 0)

GRAPHLN(undirected, unweighted, [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11], Array(1..11, {(1) = {3, 5, 7, 11}, (2) = {3, 4, 9}, (3) = {1, 2, 9, 10, 11}, (4) = {2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11}, (5) = {1, 4, 9, 10, 11}, (6) = {4, 7, 9}, (7) = {1, 4, 6, 8, 9}, (8) = {7}, (9) = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10}, (10) = {3, 5, 9}, (11) = {1, 3, 4, 5}}), `GRAPHLN/table/35`, 0)

t,m:=CodeTools:-Usage(IsSubgraphInducedIsomorphic(G1,G2,matching=true));
IsIsomorphic(G1,InducedSubgraph(G2,rhs~(m)));

memory used=5.47GiB, alloc change=0 bytes, cpu time=54.72s, real time=47.40s, gc time=8.72s

true, {1 = 13, 2 = 46, 3 = 8, 4 = 25, 5 = 29, 6 = 37, 7 = 21, 8 = 2, 9 = 4, 10 = 50, 11 = 26}

true

NULL

Code from startup region reproduced here

IsSubgraphInducedIsomorphic := proc(G1::Graph, G2::Graph, {matching::truefalse:=false})
        description "Determines if undirected loopless G1 is isomorphic to an induced subgraph of G2",
                        "and if so optionally returns the matching function for the vertices";
        local n1,n2,D1,W1,V1,A1orig,A1,D2,W2,V2,A2,perm,MM,Morder,r,Vd,V1remaining,
                depth,allV1,allV2,Mout,Mstate,expandmatching,Premaining,
                M,M1,M2,T1,T1sorted,T2,T1t,T2t,P,pair,consistent,cut,i,j;
        D1,W1,V1,A1orig := op(1..4,G1); # directedness,weightedness,vertices,neighbors
        D2,W2,V2,A2     := op(1..4,G2);
        if D1 <> 'undirected' or D2 <> 'undirected' then error "both graphs must be undirected" end if;
        n1 := nops(V1):                # number of vertices in G1
        n2 := nops(V2):
        if orseq(i in A1orig[i], i = 1..n1) or orseq(i in A2[i], i=1..n2) then error "graph(s) have self-loops" end if;
        allV1 := {$1..n1};                # all vertices in G1
        allV2 := {$1..n2};
        # simple rejections based on number of vertices and max degrees  
        if n1 > n2 then return false end if;
        if max(map(nops,A1orig)) > max(map(nops,A2)) then return false end if;
        # First presort vertices of G1 in special BFS order
        # We are not using labels so can presort in decreasing degree order outside outermost while loop
        V1remaining := sort([$1..n1], (a,b) -> nops(A1orig[a]) >= nops(A1orig[b]));
        Morder:=Array([]);
        MM:={};
        while numelems(V1remaining) <> 0 do # loop for each connected component
                r := V1remaining[1]; # root for BFS tree for this component
                Vd := [r]; # depth = 0
                while nops(Vd) > 0 do # for each depth
                        # sort according to decreasing connections to M and
                        # otherwise decreasing degree
                        if nops(Vd) > 1 then
                                Vd:=sort(Vd, proc(a,b)
                                                        local na := nops(A1orig[a] intersect MM),
                                                                 nb := nops(A1orig[b] intersect MM);
                                                        na > nb  or na = nb and nops(A1orig[a]) >= nops(A1orig[b])
                                                   end proc)
                        end if;
                        # add these to the order and update
                        Morder ,= Vd[];
                        MM := MM union {Vd[]};
                        V1remaining := remove(has, V1remaining, Vd);
                        # go one level deeper by finding new neighbors of Vd;
                        Vd:=convert(`union`(seq(A1orig[Vd])) minus MM, list);
                end do;
        end do;        
        perm:=[seq(Morder)]; # order of vertices we want.
        # We now reorder and relabel the graph so the chosen order becomes the natural order
        A1 := A1orig[perm];
        A1 := eval(A1, perm =~ [$1..n1]);
        # Start of main part of algorithm
        # current matching M is represented as a set of equations
        # that map G1 vertices (lhs) to G2 vertices (rhs), e.g., (2=4,3=5}
        #
        # expandmatching works out M1,M2,T1,T1sorted,T2,T1t,T2t for a given M
        expandmatching := proc(M) option remember;
                local
                        M1 := map(lhs,M), # set of verts in G1 in matching
                        M2 := map(rhs,M), # set of verts in G2 in matching
                        T1 := {seq(op(A1[i]), i in M1)} minus M1, # set of neighbors of M1 not in M1
                        # sort T1 in order of decreasing numbers of neighbors in M1
                        T1sorted := sort([T1[]],(a,b)->nops(A1[a] intersect M1) >= nops(A1[b] intersect M1)),
                        T2 := {seq(op(A2[i]), i in M2)} minus M2, # set of neighbors of M2 not in M2
                        # T1t = T1tilde are further away vertices
                        T1t := allV1 minus M1 minus T1,
                        T2t := allV2 minus M2 minus T2;
                M1,M2,T1,T1sorted,T2,T1t,T2t
        end proc;
        # Premaining is table indexed by a matching that gives
        # the remaining addition possibilities (P) not yet tried for this matching
        Premaining := table('sparse');
        M := {};
        Mout := 0;
        depth := 0;
        # main loop - each iteration assesses a candidate state M
        # in a depth-first search
        while depth >= 0 do
                M1,M2,T1,T1sorted,T2,T1t,T2t := expandmatching(M);
                if M1 = allV1 then # success
                        Mout := M;
                        break
                end if;
                # find remaining candidate pairs for addition to this state
                if Premaining[M] = 0 then # new M
                        if nops(T1) <> 0 then
                                P := {seq([T1sorted[1],j],j in T2)};
                        elif         nops(allV1 minus M1) > 0 then        
                                P := {seq([(allV1 minus M1)[1],j], j in (allV2 minus M2))};
                        else
                                P:={}
                        end if;
                        Premaining[M] := P;
                else
                        P := Premaining[M];
                end if;
                # check out possibilities and go deeper if one is found
                while numelems(P) > 0 do
                        pair := P[1];
                        P := P minus {pair};
                        Premaining[M] := P;
                        i,j := pair[];
                        # consistency check for [i,j]
                        # neighbors of i in M1 must correspond to neighbors of j in M2
                        consistent:=evalb(eval(A1[i] intersect M1, M) = (A2[j] intersect M2));
                        # cut rule
                        cut := evalb(nops(A2[j] intersect T2) < nops(A1[i] intersect T1)
                                or nops(A2[j] intersect T2t) < nops(A1[i] intersect T1t));
                        if consistent and not cut then
                                Mstate[depth] := M; # save state
                                depth := depth + 1;  
                                M := M union {i = j};
                                next 2
                        end if
                end do;
                # no possibilities, backtrack
                depth := depth - 1;
                M := Mstate[depth];
        end do;
        forget(expandmatching);
        # return values
        if Mout <> 0 then   
                if matching then
                        true, map(eq->V1[perm[lhs(eq)]]=V2[rhs(eq)], Mout)
                else
                        true
                    end if;
          else
                false
        end if;
end proc:

NULL

Download VF2pp.mw

@mmcdara @jalal The "this:///..." notation refers to a file within the workbook (not a .mw file), where "this" means within the current workbook; see

this help

So I think the original problem was, as @mmcdara pointed out, that it was not a string. But you don't wand to append this to currentdir(). I think the Read needs only the "this///...", but until you upload your workbook it is hard for someone to check this. As @acer pointed out, you need to compress your workbook to a .zip file before it can be uploaded to Mapleprimes - I see you have now done that.

@sursumCorda Yes, it is very fast. Adding iterations=100 to the CodeTools:-Usage shows they are both about the same time, so the apparently much faster time is a fluctuation. Vectors of integers also can be Trimmed. 

First 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 Last Page 38 of 85