@acer 

Thanks!

I was doing exc set2 task 7 (i) (ii),(iii)

The first question for 7(i) ..was about to show a portion of the Curve ? 
Do i understand it well that you did 7(ii) and 7 (iii) ?

@Carl Love 

Thanks

A special case if  dividing/multiplying  by zero is not possible. 
I must see this situation

@Carl Love 

Thank

Don't see yet what decision has to be made in the procedure
Has to with the length of the tangentline?

@acer 

Thanks

Looks good for n = 3 and i did  for n = 10 it is becoming rather small the tangentlines, but if the function is periodic then that portion of the plot counts
But perhaps with zooming in the plot i shall better see the tangentlines?
The whole plot for n = 10 shows mainly the blue points without tangentlines -> zoom in 

Its about the variable L what gives room for experimenting
Note: must study closer how this done the deravation for a variable tangentline length
I noticed horizontal tangentline is max length and minimal when the tangent line is almost vertical
Its a visual confirmation about the steepness of the tangentline

This is better than all tangentlines do have a fixed length  ( no comparison needed with another procedure what has fixed lenghts)

Do see a new programing construct : a if with quotes.

@acer 

Thanks

There was no requirement for how long the tangentlines or  inflectionlines should be in the tasks as i can see it now.
Interesting your solution for the tangent length by not taken a fixed length what i proposed.  

I am curious how this will be look in a general procedure for a any number n of tangentlines
Maybe interesting to compare both procedures for their "tangentlengths looks"?      

@acer 

Thanks

There was the idea of make the procedure general voor een given number n of tangentlines, is it not enough to base the tangentlinelength  on a sub-interval length ( some smaller), that should be enough for all tangentline lengths.
Is that not a easier solution ?

@acer 

Thanks

Suppose the slope is 0 of the tangentline then the length must fit, between a sub interval from interval a b -> the tangentpoint lie on the interval point
Maybe can this length be used for all other slopes of the tangentlines 

l@Carl Love 
Thanks
The length of the tangentlines are +- (b-a)/2n  for a given interval 
This can be a plotoption then.

n is number of tangentlines to make it general, but the task was for 6 tangentlines : a interval a b divided in 5 subintervals.

I will try to make it general the procedure for any number of tangentlines
 

@janhardo 

Tried to make as procedure Tangentlines( f,a,b) input : two number a , b as interval, but failed.
Note : in Holland we are used to one Capital letter for words : example: Raaklijnen is (TangentLines)
 

I succeeded in adding the x-valus for the tangentpoints and adding a legenda in the procedure.

betounes_ex_set_2_opg_6via_codeexample2.3_uitwerking_ac.mw

@Carl Love 

Thanks

Good to point this out and keep in mind 

@acer 

Thanks

Indeed a interesting question: what using a expression or function in a procedure definition?
But reading your post its rather complicated to judge when to use a expression or when a real function

My initial idea was to start with the procedure definition using a and b , startpoint and endpoint of the interval 

proc( f, a::numeric,b::numeric ) ,but then i noticed the range example.
Its only a,b or a..b for procedure input ,without telling what are they standing for in the procedure for a new user. 

@Carl Love 

Thanks!

I will try do my best more on my English and beware to ask a open question , because its confusing.
It was not that i ask for sure to you, to give a partial sum procedure, but got one, thanks for that.

Outcomment is text or code with # or with  /*   */ , the idea that the code is bypassed then.

Note: i tried /*  */ in a do loop contained in a procedure, but that is not working. 
Concerning the summed up issues : all points need more study from my side 

But seeing in example makes more clear.
This code example ,must be reworked

PR:=proc(A,N)   # PR is product
   p:=1;
   for i from 1 to N do p:=p*A[i] end do:
end proc;  

@acer 

Thanks

I study all the attachments.

I am aware of the expression or operator input for a procedure that they differ, how could it go wrong?

@acer 

Thanks

Yes, i add a pointplot and extent the array ,but forget to adjust p[0] into p[0,1] 

I took a working procedure from you with maplemint no errors and then with my not working procedure with maple mint with errors and compare.

Its the first time i add quotes ...(could it be that i took old original code from example 2.3 again without quotes, that happened i think)   

That rng::range(numeric definition)  is not precisely explained how it works ..it is in Maple help ?

Evaluation rules the books give explanation about levels and the procedure variables are also different evaluated then in a interactive session.
a=b,b=c,c=d,d=16 is evaluated at   a=16 this is fourth level of evaluation in a interactive session as example.

@acer 

It was more difficult then i thought to make this procedure Tangentlines(f,a..b), but it is not working as intended.

betounes_ex_set_2_opg_6via_codeexample2.3_uitwerking.mw