@C_R  how we can make 2D plot when parameter change like this 

@C_R this is easy example but if this is come out the other will come too i have same function same variable but the graph is different i don't know why?

F1.mw

@C_R  it is emazing, but very ugly animate not like a graph pretty

@C_R there is any way for change them to animation showing?

@C_R  i am proud of you the cod is a big help for me  thank you so much ...

@C_R  Realy i am looking for this come out

plot3d(map(Re, solnum)

plot3d(map(Im, solnum)

can you do it by yourself becuase really i don't know where i should add this code you write ,  i did by myself instead of mine and outcome of this code  is really emazing  i want a favour from you if you  have time, please do the code and upload a work sheet  also use seperatly use the second code when use subs , sorry for this demand  but really i needed and i want to see your talent of graph

@dharr are you best of the best !
 

@dharr is working thank you so much

@dharr  the code will run if you remove the (:) in last of sentence
i have a lot of equation and this identity not work for thus i found another way but the calculation need time i want use thus code for finding equation but i want  use identity code for finding parameter this thing posible or not i will add my worksheet here

new2.mw

@C_R  we don't know the B_0 but when we substitute G(x) in B_0 after simplify must be equal to i*beta^5*exp(i*x)

we just need calculate and simplify exp and conjugate of exp to get answer i don't know why not calculate

 

Download Am.mw

@acer when i stuck i didn't know some other information but i want add another question for be newed and people see that file MP3 is so different it is another code for it and you delete it really is different ...when you don't get answer you should looking until find solution

@acer  is not duplicate you think it is ,you even don't watch the question ,when don't wanna help, don't intrupt the help

so and i don't know why don't calculate for three or four variable i don't know what is mistake

mp2.mw

@acer ok i will add here
i fiqure out in my code there is a small problem which when i multiply u*conjugate(u)  maple just calculate u as function and conjugate(u) as a number but both of them are function how  fixed this problem , i try to replaced by another function it is response true but i want directly find out not changing the function it make the code be a lot longer and maybe need hand computation a little bit , can any one help?

mp2.mw

@dharr i keep looking i can't undrestand when we have multiply between the function is not doing code i will keep looking  thanks for help