Hi,

I'd like to know, if it is possible to define any sort of range for parameters in NonlinearFit. E. g. I know that one of parameters should be somewhere between 0.2 - 0.4. I know there is a possibility of initalvalues, but using it doesn't lead into this range.

Thanks.

Hi!

I am so pleased to be here to look for help in using Maple.

I am trying to find solutions to a set of nonlinear systems of equations using fsolve.

This code I am tried to solve is shown as follow:

 nonlinearsystemforallsolution.mw

I can get one solution for three variables, however, it's clear there are some solutions missed.

My questions are listed as:

1) How do I get all solutions for a fixed variable of sigma?

2) How do I create a  loop to obtain the solutions for various values of sigma?

3) How to plot solution of each variables versus sigma? 

3) How do I determine the stability of each solution?

Many thanks in advance.

sincerely

Hi Mapleprimes,

I am having difficulties trying to evaluate the following integral

int(-(C__A*K + 1)/(k*C__A), C__A = C__A .. C__A0, numeric = false)

Where the limits are undefined(unknown) symbolic limits, C_A0 is intial concentration, CA is actual concentration. Maple returns the same equation when I try it. I haven't loaded any packages.

I could of course just evaluate the indefinite version and manually substitute but I think that defeats the purpose of using maple.

Any thoughts will be greatly appreciated.

Maple 2020.1

The worksheet below contains an example of the tiling of the hyperbolic plane.

I would like to produce this and other hyperbolic plane tilings from Maple worksheets, but I don't know the math technique for doing so.

Please direct me to a source of the requisite knowledge or an example worksheet which I can study and imitate.

Hyperbolic_Plane_Tiling.mw

I create a table of 3D points in one worksheet and would like to use these values at a later time in a separate worksheet.

What is the simplest way to do this?

Download plotting_elements_of_matrix.mw

I would like to know how to make a graph like the attached. The Figure IV is showing the changes in the evolution of the rate of technological progress (a topic in economics).

I would like to make a graph exactly like the image attached where it clearly shows the name of the x- and y-axis; the name of the functions; the 45-degree line; the transition from "theta_1" to "theta_2" with the arrows, etc. (In fact, I want to have everything the same from the graph). 

I have attached a PDF document with the definition of the functions and the figure itself. I have also attached the image of the figure on this thread. 

IMG_633.pdf

For examples, they are two non-commutative variables x and y, and i use "Setup(noncommutativeprefix={x,y})" to define.
 As the previous results have shown that AntiCommutator(x,x)=0 and AntiCommutator(y,y)=0, so i just define Setup(algebrarules={%AntiCommutator(x,x)=0, %AntiCommutator(y,y)=0}).
When i am calculating AntiCommutator(x,y), the maple automatically simplifies the results and returns AntiCommutator(x,y)=0, as variables x and y are thought to be GrassmannParity =1 variables.

Consider two  3*3 matrix e23 and e32, the AntiCommutator of (e23, e23)=(e32,e32)=0, but the AntiCommutator(e23,e32)= e22+e33.

So how the algebrarules work and why there is the contradiction ?

The file is attached.

Download err.mw

The command 'coeff' doesn't work.

Hi,

What am I doing wrong? Seems like some unit compatibility problem when tryaing to solve simple task with momentum conservation rule...

with(Units);
Automatically loading the Units[Simple] subpackage

m__2 := 0.400*Unit('kg');
m__1 := 0.300*Unit('kg');
x__w := 0.700*Unit('m');

v__2p := 0.000;

v__1p := 2*Unit(('m')/('s'));

Download zadanie_z_jednostakim_-_problem.mw

m__1*v__1p + m__2*v__2p = m__1*v__1k + m__2*v__2k;
                                               /s\
             0.6 = (0.3 v__1k + 0.4 v__2k) Unit|-|
                                               \m/

subs(v__2p = 0, 0.600 = (0.300*v__1k + 0.400*v__2k)*Units[Unit](s/m));
                                               /s\
             0.6 = (0.3 v__1k + 0.4 v__2k) Unit|-|
                                               \m/

v__1k := solve(0.600 = (0.300*v__1k + 0.400*v__2k)*Units[Unit](s/m), v__1k);
                                                  /m\
           v__1k := (-1.333333333 v__2k + 2.) Unit|-|
                                                  \s/

1/2*m__1*v__1p^2 + 1/2*m__2*v__2p^2 = 1/2*m__1*v__1k^2 + 1/2*m__1*v__2k^2;

Error, (in Units:-Simple:-+) the following expressions imply incompatible dimensions: {.1500000000*(-1.333333333*v__2k+2.)^2*Units:-Unit(J)+.1500000000*Units:-Unit(kg)*v__2k^2}

Sitting and trying find solution in help and on forum but no chance.

I hope if someone copy code into maple it will look lik on my screen. Anyway I have uploaded file and below You have screen picture.

If I remove units from variables on the top all is working like a charm.

Please help me find an error guys.

Reagrds

Marcin

Hello,

I have a complex transfer function.  I've defined everyting as "real" via:

assum := Rsrc::real, C1::real, Lp::real, C2::real, f::real, RL::real, 0 < Rsrc, 0 < C1, 0 < Lp, 0 < C2, 0 < RL, 0 < f

I'm expecting simplify to reduce the following transfer function so that the denominator is real, but I can't get it to do it:

I have every variable defined as real, so I am not sure why it won't simplify this expression.

Thank you

 

Hi,

I am currently working on structural dynamics problem where I'am trying to obtain the dynamic response of a high-rise building.

To do so I am working in the frequency domain where I was able to find my solution and now I want to obtain the solution in the real time domain by using the inverse fourier function. 

Now the problem comes when applying the inverse fourier transform. The expression which I am trying to tarnsform is extremely long and so Maple requires a lot of time. I tried to run it but after half a day it would still be evaluating. Would there be a way to speed up this process? I attached the worksheet if you're interested.

Thanks in advance :)

nieuw.mw

This worksheet produces a very strange error.

I have examined every assignment and cannot find one which relates to the error message.

Can anyone help here?

Strange_Error.mw 

Hello :-)

I am trying to solve a third degree polynomial with assumptions, but I do not understand Maple's answers.

I think I am not doing it ''correctly''.

Can someone please help me understand why Maple gives me these answers and how I could get the ones that Maple gives me when I fix a value for my parameter t ? Please have a look at the attached file : test1.mw

I hope my questions are clear, please don't hesitate if you need clarifications.

Thank you very much for your help and your advices.

I solve for a transfer function using Syrup, and want to operate on the Real part and Imagninary parts separately.  I've added "assumes" statements for every variable:  

assume(Rsrc, real);
assume(C1, real);
assume(Lp, real);
assume(C2, real);
assume(f, real);
assume(RL, real);
additionally(0 < Rsrc, 0 < C1, 0 < Lp, 0 < C2, 0 < RL, 0 < f);

When I then do something like :

 
instead of gettting just the real part of the expression, I get :

as if one of the variables was still not assumed to be Real.  I'm not sure where all the '~' are coming from ---is that the issue?

I apologize, I can't insert content for some reason..., although I can add the worksheeet.
pi_filter_osc_anal.mw