Carl Love

Carl Love

24663 Reputation

25 Badges

10 years, 56 days
Natick, Massachusetts, United States
My name was formerly Carl Devore.

MaplePrimes Activity

These are answers submitted by Carl Love

The mathematical constant is spelled Pi (capital P); pi (lowercase) is just another variable.

To convert the units, do 

convert(Rac, units, ohm);

The displayed form will use the capital Omega that you expect.

Here's a procedure for it. Since I suspect that you only want to exclude the integral if the special function depends on the variable of integration, I included an optional second parameter for a variable name or set of variable names. The procedure is constructed with subs so that the calls to FunctionAdvisor and the construction of the set are only done once.

has_special_math_function:= subs(
    _F= {(op@FunctionAdvisor)~(FunctionAdvisor("class_members", "quiet"), "quiet")[]}
        minus {FunctionAdvisor("elementary", "quiet")[]},
    proc(e::algebraic, x::{name, set(name)}:= {})
        hastype(e, And(specfunc(_F), dependent(x)))
    end proc
has_special_math_function := proc (e::algebraic, x::{name, set(name)} := {})
    hastype(e, And(specfunc({AiryAi, AiryBi, 
        AngerJ, BellB, BesselI, BesselJ, BesselK, BesselY, Beta, 
        Chi, Ci, Dirac, Ei, GAMMA, HeunB, HeunC, HeunD, HeunG, 
        HeunT, Im, JacobiP, KummerM, KummerU, Li, MeijerG, Psi, Re, 
        Shi, Si, Ssi, StruveH, StruveL, WeberE, Zeta, abs, dawson, 
        dilog, erf, erfc, erfi, euler, fourier, hankel, hilbert, 
        laplace, lnGAMMA, max, mellin, min, polylog, signum, 
        unwindK, AppellF1, AppellF2, AppellF3, AppellF4, ChebyshevT, 
        ChebyshevU, CompleteBellB, CoulombF, CylinderD, CylinderU, 
        CylinderV, EllipticCE, EllipticCK, EllipticCPi, EllipticE, 
        EllipticF, EllipticK, EllipticModulus, EllipticNome, 
        EllipticPi, FresnelC, FresnelS, Fresnelf, Fresnelg, 
        GaussAGM, GegenbauerC, HankelH1, HankelH2, Heaviside, 
        HermiteH, HeunBPrime, HeunCPrime, HeunDPrime, HeunGPrime, 
        HeunTPrime, IncompleteBellB, InverseJacobiAM, InverseJacobiCD,
        InverseJacobiCN, InverseJacobiCS, InverseJacobiDC, 
        InverseJacobiDN, InverseJacobiDS, InverseJacobiNC, 
        InverseJacobiND, InverseJacobiNS, InverseJacobiSC, 
        InverseJacobiSD, InverseJacobiSN, JacobiAM, JacobiCD, 
        JacobiCN, JacobiCS, JacobiDC, JacobiDN, JacobiDS, JacobiNC, 
        JacobiND, JacobiNS, JacobiSC, JacobiSD, JacobiSN, 
        JacobiTheta1, JacobiTheta2, JacobiTheta3, JacobiTheta4, 
        JacobiZeta, KelvinBei, KelvinBer, KelvinHei, KelvinHer, 
        KelvinKei, KelvinKer, LaguerreL, LambertW, LegendreP, 
        LegendreQ, LerchPhi, LommelS1, LommelS2, MathieuA, MathieuB, 
        MathieuC, MathieuCE, MathieuCEPrime, MathieuCPrime, 
        MathieuExponent, MathieuFloquet, MathieuS, MathieuSE, 
        MathieuSEPrime, MathieuSPrime, MultiPolylog, MultiZeta, 
        NielsenPolylog, SphericalY, Stirling1, Stirling2, 
        WeierstrassP, WeierstrassZeta, WhittakerM, WhittakerW, 
        Wrightomega, argument, bernoulli, binomial, conjugate, 
        doublefactorial, factorial, fouriercos, fouriersin, 
        harmonic, hypergeom, invfourier, invhilbert, invlaplace, 
        invmellin, multinomial, piecewise, pochhammer, GeneralizedPolylog, 
        MathieuFloquetPrime, WeierstrassPPrime, WeierstrassSigma}), 
end proc

You may want to exclude some functions such as signumabsReImargument, etc. from that set.

Setting the value of _Envsignum0 only affects signum(0), not signum(a) for arbitrary a.

FWIW, you could do 

limit(diff(y*fy, y), y= 0, right) assuming a > 0

to make signum(a) = 1. For that matter, you could do

eval(limit(diff(y*fy, y), y= 0, right), [signum= 1, csgn= 1])

although it's not clear to me why you don't want signum in the result.

The command 

series(x/(tan(x) - sin(x)), x= 0)

shows that f(x) is approximately equal to 2/x^2 for x close to 0. This suggests that g(x) = 1/x^2 might be a reasonable choice.

In procedure SOR, change x_0:= x to

x_0[]:= x

This overwrites the vector's elements rather than its pointer.

Like this:

plots:-animatte(plot, [[[x1, z1], [x2, z2](t), [x3, z3](t)]], t= 0..T, frames= n);

where is positive and n a positive integer.

If you want to create a dynamically sized array row-by-row (rather than element-by-element) and then convert it to a matrix, it can be done like this:

A:= Array(1..0):
for i to 9 do A,= (i, i+1, i+2) od:
B:= ArrayTools:-Alias(A, [9,3], C_order);

This is an efficient conversion requiring no intermediate lists or other structures. It doesn't even need to copy the data; it just creates a new pointer to the original array with a different indexing scheme.

The output of plottools:-transform, which you've assigned to t1, is a procedure, so you need to use procedure-calling syntax to use it. Change t1{p1, p2, p3} to

t1~([p1, p2, p3])

Or, you can use t1 to operate on the combined plot like this:

t1(plots:-display(p1, p2, p3))

If you're performing a chain of substitutions, it doesn't make sense to me to introduce intermediate variables that are both

  1. not wanted in the final result,
  2. not eliminated by some part of the chain.

That's the case with your f0, and it's what causes your troubles. Just remove f0 from equ5.

You've also made a logical error in equ4`w__k,norm` should be w__k because `w__k,norm` is already eliminated by equ1.

The command subs is inappropriate for doing sophisticated algebra; a better choice is simplify with side relations (see ?simplify,siderels).

After making those corrections, this will do the conversion that you want:

        errfunc, combinedSet,
        #Since combinedSet has 7 equations, it's best to choose 7 variables to eliminate, but
        #there's some flexibility allowed in which you choose and in which order you put them. 
        [Z__k, Z0, R__x, C__x, L__x, w__k, z__k]


Let's say that your original sequence of solutions is named sols. Then do

solsnn:= select(type, {sols}, set(name=nonnegative))[];

The Answer by @mmcdara is very educational. You can learn a lot about systems of equations and about solving them with Maple from it, and you should study it. Nonetheless, there is an easier way which isn't so educational.

(ia, va, ib, vb):= Vector~(4, symbol=~ [Ia, Va, Ib, Vb])[]: 
(ya, yb):= Matrix~((4,4), symbol=~ [Ya, Yb])[]:
    (Ia[3], Ia[4], Va[3], Va[4])=~ (-Ib[1], -Ib[2], Vb[1], Vb[2]) 
Y11Condition:= (Va[2], Vb[3], Vb[4])=~ 0:
Eqs:= eval(
    {seq( - ia), seq(yb.vb - ib)}, 
    {ConnectCondition, Y11Condition}
Svars:= seq~({ia, ib, va, vb}) intersect indets(Eqs) minus {Va[1]}: 
S:= subsindets(
    simplify(solve(Eqs, Svars)),
    n-> cat(op(0,n), op(n))
lprint(Ia1 = eval(Ia1, S));
Ia1 = (((Ya44+Yb22)*Ya33+(-Yb21-Ya43)*Ya34+Ya44*Yb11+Yb11*Yb22-Yb12*Yb21-Ya43*

The is the beginning of an HTML code for a special character; `>` is the "greater than" symbol >; `"` is the double-quotation symbol ". These are not part of ordinary Maple code (unless entered as a part of a quoted string). You must be copying from an HTML source. In actual Maple code, those 4 lines are

for m from n by -2 while n > 2 do
if errr > perrr or errrs > perrrs then
if derrr > 10^10 then
printf(" \134n");

I don't know what \134n in the last command means. Perhaps it's supposed to be just \n, which is the newline character.

All of that (isotherms, 3d plots of Nusselt number, skin friction, etc.) is covered in this Post:

Like this:

PlotEllipseFromMatrix:= proc(H::Matrix(2, realcons), C::Vector(2, realcons))    
local x, y, X:= <x,y>-C;
    if LinearAlgebra:-IsDefinite(H) = true then 
        algcurves:-plot_real_curve(X^+.H.X - 1, x, y)
        error "not an ellipse, or it can't be determined"
end proc

 PlotEllipseFromMatrix(<3,1;1,1>, <1,2>);

One may wonder What is the difference between an explicit logarithmic plotting command and a simple plot with option axis= [mode=log]? The answer is that the explicit command chooses the points to plot so that the independent variable values will become roughly evenly spaced after the logarithm is applied; whereas the axis= [mode= log] option chooses exactly the same points as would've been chosen if the option weren't there and then applies the logarithm. Thus, your plot command sees the subrange 10^6..10^7 as an insignificant part (less than 1/1000th) of the overall range 10^6..10^10.

Here's the same thing using plots:-loglogplot:

Z__target:= 50e-3*Unit(ohm):
f__roll_off:= 35e6*Unit(Hz):
f__range:= 1e6..1e10:
Z__target_ac:= f-> Z__target*sqrt(1+(f/f__roll_off)^2):
    Z__target_ac(f*Unit(Hz)), f= f__range, color= red,
    gridlines, axes= boxed, title= "    Target Impedance\n",
    labels= ["Frequency (Hz)", "Impedance (&Omega;)"],
    axis[2]= [tickmarks= [3, subticks= 4]],
    labeldirections= [horizontal, vertical]

Also, regardless of your plot command, there's no need for the log[10]10^20, or evalf in Z__target_ac.

Note how I controlled the tickmarks on the vertical axis with
axis[2]= [tickmarks= [3, subticks= 4]]

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Last Page 3 of 361