I am in the process of trying to learn Maple. As an exercise I am trying to plot an amplitude modulated waveform. No problem plotting the waveform of the carrier and the modulating signal but for some reason (user error on my part) I can't plot the combined waveform y given by. 

y = [1 + M*cos(2*Pi*f__m*t)]*A*sin(2*Pi*f__c*t)

Where the following values have been set M = 0.5, A = 1, f_m = 2, f_c = 10.

Plotting y using the following

plot(y, t = 0 .. 1, title = "Graph of Carrier", labels = ["time (seconds)", "Amplitude (Volts)"], color = red);

Gives the following error. Having tried various combinations of variables, values, single parameter functions etc I need a pointer as to where I am going wrong. 

Warning, unable to evaluate the function to numeric values in the region; see the plotting command's help page to ensure the calling sequence is correct
What I am expecting is a graph similar to the below derived in Excel? My version of Maple is 2023.2

I have plotted a 3D figure by maple 2023. but all numbers and units on axes are seen a black boxes. How can fix this problem?

After my maple (2023) had a crash (froze) and i forc closed it all my files are opened and then changed. All equation fields are changed into "Maple Input" type equations. This completely ruins all my "document" type files where the appearance of the equations was important. More than that most of the changed equations give rise to errors. So the file is basically destroyed. The odd thing is that the file looks fine the first few seconds, but then it is changed completely.
I have uninstalled 2023, and installed Maple 2024 without success. 

Plz help!

How do I get Maple 2023 to simplify/combine units in results?  For example,

Quantity(3.3897859*Unit(km^2)/Unit(m^2), 0.2) ;

should simplify to

Quantity(3389785.9, 0.2) ;

The full example where the problem occurs is given below.

alias(l = log10, l100 = log[100], pi[0] = Pi, r = sqrt, S_ellipsoid = ellipsoid) :
with(ScientificErrorAnalysis) :
with(Units) :

_km := Unit(km) :
_lm := Unit(lm) :
_lx := Unit(lx) :
_m := Unit(m) :
_rev := Unit(rev) :
alias(Q = Quantity) :
AddUnit(astronomical_unit, context = astronomy, default = true, conversion = 149597870700*m) :
pi := pi[0] :
S_spheroid := (a, b) -> S_ellipsoid(a, a, b) :

_AU := Unit(AU) :
a_Mars := Q(227939366., 1.)*_km : ##
a_Terra := Q(149598023., 1.)*_km : ##
alpha_Phobos := Q(9517.58, 0.01)*_km : ##
B_Phobos := Q(0.071, 0.012) :
d_x_Phobos := Q(25.90, 0.08)*_km :
d_y_Phobos := Q(22.60, 0.08)*_km :
d_z_Phobos := Q(18.32, 0.06)*_km :
E_I := _lx :
H_Mars := -Q(1.5, 0.1) : ##
L_Sol := Q(3.75E28, 0.01E28)*_lm : ##
m_E := -Q(14.18, 0.01) : ##
pi_Phobos := Q(9234.42, 0.01)*_km : ##
r_e_Mars := Q(3396.2, 0.1)*_km :
r_e_Terra := Q(6378137.0, 0.1)*_m : ##
S_sphere := r -> S_spheroid(r, r) :
theta_rev := _rev :

a_Phobos := (alpha_Phobos + pi_Phobos)/2 :
Delta_Sol := a_Terra - r_e_Terra : 
l_A := _AU :
m := E -> m_E - 5*l100(E/E_I) :
r_x_Phobos := d_x_Phobos/2 :
r_y_Phobos := d_y_Phobos/2 :
r_z_Phobos := d_z_Phobos/2 :
theta_rev2 := theta_rev/2 :

Delta_Mars := r(a_Mars^2 + Delta_Sol^2) : 
q := theta -> 2*((sin(theta)/pi) + (1 - (theta/theta_rev2))*cos(theta))/3 :
r_e_Phobos := (r_x_Phobos + r_y_Phobos)/2 :
S_Phobos := S_ellipsoid(r_x_Phobos, r_y_Phobos, r_z_Phobos) :

Delta_Phobos := Delta_Mars : 
L_Phobos := B_Phobos*L_Sol*S_Phobos/(2*S_sphere(a_Mars)) :
mu_Mars := 5*l(a_Mars*Delta_Mars/l_A^2) : 
rho_e_Mars := arcsin(r_e_Mars/Delta_Mars) :
theta_Mars := arccos((a_Mars^2 + Delta_Mars^2 - Delta_Sol^2)/(2*a_Mars*Delta_Mars)) :

E_Phobos := L_Phobos/S_sphere(Delta_Phobos) :
m_Mars := H_Mars + mu_Mars - 5*l100(q(theta_Mars)) :
rho_e_Phobos := arcsin(r_e_Phobos/Delta_Phobos) :
rho_o_Phobos := arctan(a_Phobos/Delta_Phobos) :

Deltarho_Phobos := rho_o_Phobos - rho_e_Mars - rho_e_Phobos :
m_Phobos := m(E_Phobos) :

Deltam_Phobos := m_Phobos - m_Mars :

Deltarhostar_Phobos := Deltarho_Phobos/Deltam_Phobos :

"Phobos apparent logarithmic brightness in astronomical magnitudes" = combine(m_Phobos, errors) ;
"Mars-Phobos apparent angular separation in arcseconds" = combine(convert(Deltarhostar_Phobos, units, arcsec), errors) ;

(*
https://www.nicolesharp.net/wiki/Solar_System_data_for_Maple
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/astronomical_unit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Sol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Terra
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terran_radius
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WGS84
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Mars
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_Phobos
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_System_by_size
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/illuminance
*)

Hi,

Experiencing the following problem.  One of our servers was cloned, the GUID was replaced and then rejoined to the domain.  All applications are working exept Maple.  The application launches but then closes right away.  No error messages provided so not sure where else to look for possible fixes to this problem.  The application is runing on Server 2022.

Thank you.

I have a system of 4 nonlinear equations in 4 lambda variables. I cannot obtain a solution using solve():

4_nonlinear_equations.mw

I can sometimes simplify similar systems by rescaling equations to reduce parameters. With only 3 parameters (sigma_v, sigma_d, sigma_d3) in this case, complexity arises from the interactions of the 4 lambdas in the 4 equations. Upon examining the equations (highlighted in yellow), I suspect hidden symmetries. Is it possible to solve the system by rewriting the equations in terms of each other to find an equivalent system? I am exploring if a smarter and simpler reformulation could lead to a solution. Thank you.

Can someone tell me how to calculate the Christoffel symbols in spherical coordinates in Euclidean three dimensional space?

Thank you very much in advance!

Hi!

So I like to check that my manual integrations and/or maple integrations are equal with each other. I normally do this using the Test Relation function.

I was working on a problem and noticed that Maple didn't evaluate the integrals being the same, even though they presumedly are.

Could anyone shed some light on why I get this inequality?

Thanks in advance!

mapleintvsmanualint.mw

Download mapleintvsmanualint.mw

Suppose I want to run several systems of equations as below, however, the processing time exceeds 45 thousand seconds (reaching hours of calculations)

• What is better, buying a new processor (new notebook) or buying a new stick of RAM?
• Or does none of this affect Maple? Therefore, it is just a computational disadvantage (the delay time), characterizing the slowness of the program for very large systems as an imminent characteristic.
• Another question: The newer Maples (new versions) seem to be heavier to run. Is it just me? What seems to me is that the previous versions of Maple, because they contain fewer resources, are lighter and run certain calculations faster. Would this be correct?
• Last question: Is it possible to do parallel processing in Maple? So that calculations on huge systems can be run faster

Thank you so much! :)

I have a 2-parameters quartic equation in n (where n>=2 and integer) and want to find for which parameter values it is zero, if any exists.

Here I am analyzing the signs of each coefficient, but is there a faster way to solve my problem?
Thanks.

quartic_equation_in_n.mw

I want to solve n nonlinear equations in n unknowns named lambda[1], lambda[2], ..., lambda[n]. For simplicity, I assume n=3. Each of the three equations includes matrices and dot products.

Running solve() takes forever...I assume this is because Maple is trying to find the explicit form. I am not sure, but I have reasons to believe that a solution exists.

Questions:

1. Did I set up the three equations correctly? Is there a simpler or smarter way to set up my problem?
2. Is it okay for Maple that lambda[i] sometimes appears isolated and sometimes as a component of a vector?  
3. Is there a way to keep my quantities (except the lambda vector I guess, since it containts the lambda[i] component I need to solve for) undefined/implicit while making sure Maple correctly deals with matrices and dot products?
   e.g., the solution should display terms like p^%T.R.w as such, rather than the corresponding explicit computation...

Worksheet:

Download dot_products.mw

Download at_44_Mpa_at_100C.mw

how to solve this ?

Download creep_integral_sol.mw

 I don't know how to solve with maple the following inequality with respect to the real variable x, n being an integer
Please tell me the procedure.

(f(x,n)>0 and (f(x,n)<0

f := (x, n) -> 2^n/(1 + n*2^n*x^2) - 2*x^2*(2^n)^2*n/(1 + n*2^n*x^2)^2

I want to compute the limit for a parameter (gamma) to infinity of an expression which includes summations over indexes. Below are two approaches. I believe that both should produce the same output, however:

1. Approach A generates a signum, but I don't understand where this is coming from
2. Approach B works smoothly once I fix the final value n of the index to some number but runs very slow if I leave n undefined (I had to interrupt the execution)

Maybe approach B is not wrong, and I just need to wait longer...

Any thoughts? 

Download Infinity_limit_and_summations.mw