Andiguys

100 Reputation

5 Badges

1 years, 268 days

MaplePrimes Activity


These are questions asked by Andiguys

I want to present my regional plot similar to the sample shown, using appropriate legends and labels. What syntax should I use to achieve this? Also, the axis labels need to be clear and bold, as they currently appear faded. What modifications should I make in the syntax?

Q1.mw

SAMPLE:

I would like to express the decision variables Pn_W,w_W,Ce_W,i1_W,Pn_D,w_D,Ce_D...other variables...​ in a compact form. Since their analytical expressions are lengthy, I want to identify terms and define appropriate composite parameters to simplify their representation.

Q_shorten_1.mw

For example ,  Suppose the original expression is: q := ((Cn - a)^2 + (P - d - b)*x^2 + Cn - a - b)/y(Cn - a)^2

Lets say Cn - a =X , P - d - b =S

Then the expression can be rewritten as: q = (X^2 + S*x^2 + X - b)/yX^2

I’m having trouble solving this. Any suggestions would be helpful.

NULL

restart

``

with(Optimization); with(plots); with(Student[VectorCalculus]); with(LinearAlgebra)

``

ineq := simplify((Cr*rho0*t*(Cr*alpha*b-alpha-1)*d^2+((alpha*((-g*i2+a)*Cr+2*Crm+2*c+3*t-2*Pr)*Cr*b+((g*i2-a)*Cr-2*Crm-2*c-2*t+2*Pr)*alpha+(g*i2-a)*Cr-2*t)*rho0+(2*(Cr*b-1))*(sigma*t+Cn-Pr+delta-1))*d+(alpha*((-g*i2+a)*Cr+2*Crm+2*c+2*t-2*Pr)*b+2*g*i2-2*a)*rho0+2*b*(sigma*t+Cn-Pr+delta-1))^2 > (((alpha*Cr*((-g*i2+a)*Cr+2*Crm+2*c-2*Pr)*b+((g*i2-a)*Cr-2*Crm-2*c+2*Pr)*alpha-(-g*i2+a)*Cr)*rho0+(2*(Cr*b-1))*(delta+Cn-Pr-1))*d+(alpha*((-g*i2+a)*Cr+2*Crm+2*c-2*Pr)*b+2*g*i2-2*a)*rho0+2*b*(delta+Cn-Pr-1))^2)

(((alpha*Cr*((-g*i2+a)*Cr+2*Crm+2*c-2*Pr)*b+((g*i2-a)*Cr-2*Crm-2*c+2*Pr)*alpha-(-g*i2+a)*Cr)*rho0+2*(Cr*b-1)*(delta+Cn-Pr-1))*d+(alpha*((-g*i2+a)*Cr+2*Crm+2*c-2*Pr)*b+2*g*i2-2*a)*rho0+2*b*(delta+Cn-Pr-1))^2 < (Cr*rho0*t*(Cr*alpha*b-alpha-1)*d^2+((alpha*((-g*i2+a)*Cr+2*Crm+2*c+3*t-2*Pr)*Cr*b+((g*i2-a)*Cr-2*Crm-2*c-2*t+2*Pr)*alpha+(g*i2-a)*Cr-2*t)*rho0+2*(Cr*b-1)*(sigma*t+Cn-Pr+delta-1))*d+(alpha*((-g*i2+a)*Cr+2*Crm+2*c+2*t-2*Pr)*b+2*g*i2-2*a)*rho0+2*b*(sigma*t+Cn-Pr+delta-1))^2

(1)

  

``extra := indets(ineq,And(name,Not(constant))) >~ 0;

{0 < Cn, 0 < Cr, 0 < Crm, 0 < Pr, 0 < a, 0 < alpha, 0 < b, 0 < c, 0 < d, 0 < delta, 0 < g, 0 < i2, 0 < rho0, 0 < sigma, 0 < t}

(2)

 

(solve({ineq}, t) assuming extra[]);

 

``

Download Q_solve.mw

I require the condition for equations  C1<C2<C4​, with all parameters strictly positive and subject to the constraint t > t1​.
I want to solve for the variables t and s. Specifically, what are the analytical conditions on t that ensure C2>C1​, and what are the analytical conditions on s that ensure C4 > C2 >C1​ ?

I attempted to solve this , but I keep encountering errors.
Q_solving_t_and_s.mw

In the plot shown below, one of the axes is not visible, and one of the lines inside the graph is also missing. Is there an error in the plotting syntax that is causing this issue? Could anyone please identify the mistake and suggest how to correct it

All_plots_Question.mw

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Last Page 1 of 11