Here is a simple procedure that works fine if entered using 1D Maple input
> Q:=proc(x)
sin(x)
end proc;
but if you use 2D math input
> q:=proc(x)
sin(x);

  end proc;

Error, unterminated procedure
    Typesetting:-mambiguous(qAssignTypesetting:-mambiguous(

      procApplyFunction(x) sinApplyFunction(x),

      Typesetting:-merror("unterminated procedure")))
Error, unable to parse
    Typesetting:-mambiguous(  Typesetting:-mambiguous(end,

      Typesetting:-merror("unable to parse")) procsemi)

Ouch! But to confuse things further the following procedures may be entered using 2D math and work fine:
>H := proc (x) x^2*sin(x) end proc;
>K := proc (x) sin(x^2) end proc;
Doesn't make any sense to me. Perhaps 2D math is not ready for prime time?

 

Hi!

I have a rather long Maple code and want it to be executed multiple times with a parameter changed each time.

Surely this can be done with the loop structure, but it seems the whole loop structure must be contained into one single execution group, which makes it to be a little inconvenient, since the code is too long.

So is there any alternative way to realize this utility?

Best regard and thanks!

This is not a problem per se, but more to understand the background.

restart;

f := polylog(2, -x);

int(f/(x+1), x);

convert(f, dilog);

int(%/(x+1), x)

The integration of the polylog maple is not capable of doing, but after converting to dilog it finds an anti derivative.

That leads to the question, why is dilog as a separate to polylog(2,*) implemented anyway? Why couldn't it all be done with the more general polylog function?

I'm also wondering why maple has difficulties to integrate

int(dilog(x+1)/(x+a),x)

for general a.

Using Maple 2018.2.1, I'm receiving a lost kernel message when importing the attached data file with ImportMatrix. I traced the issue to a "*" symbol at the end of the file but would have expected this to cause an error message (if any error at all) instead of the connection to the kernel to be lost. Is this a bug or am I misunderstanding the usage of ImportMatrix?

test.mw

test2.txt

I try to solve ODE with conditions, but it give answer only without conditions:

SOT.mw

Thank you.

Dear authors,
How to solve this ode problem.

Download link ode.mw

In this problem the boundary condition is

Note: F=g in our problem.

eta approaches N.

Thank you.

Download threads!.mw

is possible to solve this pde via maple?

m1.mwm1.mw
 

Download m1.mw

convert(...,Int) in Maple 2018.2 works for fourier, invfourier, laplace, but does not work for invlaplace.  

Why is that? Is there a workaround?

expr:=fourier(f(x), x, w):
convert(expr,Int);

expr:=invfourier(f(w), w, x):
convert(expr,Int);

expr:=laplace(f(s),s,t):
convert(expr,Int)

expr:=invlaplace(f(s),s,t):
convert(expr,Int)

Was expecting to see the Mellin's inverse formula.

Maple 2018.2 on windows 10

How can I calculate the Euler-Lagrange equation from the Lagrangian density from Gauged Baby Skyrme model in maple using the physics package? Here, the rules of the operation in the inner space are the same that of the vectors conventional: dot and cross products, etc...
Following below the Lagrangian density.

Errata:

Hello,

every time I input a formula I get:

Typesetting:-mparsed(x^2 +5 -2,x^2+3; "_noterminate")

I can't get rid of this error: this is very basic, what happened?

TIA, Roberto

i want to gain diff(p(t), t) and diff(q(t), t) and Jacobian matrix
 according to the attached pdf file.

please help me.

thanks

simplify.mw
 

subs.pdf

Download simplify.mw

Hi, I'm using Maple 2018 and I tried to run coding from https://www.maplesoft.com/applications/view.aspx?sid=4194&view=html

however, it said : unable to parse. I figured out that the problem maybe is in the if loop. though it seems perfectly fine, but it has some goto commands that i cannot search on maple website. does this mean that the goto cannot be used here and should be replaced? if yes, then how? 

i am still learning on how to use maple. any help would be much appreciated. thank you!

this is the coding for if loop:

label_7;

rv:=vector([p1(x1pt,x2pt),p2(x1pt,x2pt)]):

numgeval:=numgeval+1;

printf("%5d (%8.4f,%8.4f)",numIter,rv[1],rv[2]);

max:=n;

mg:=convert(sqrt(dotprod(rv,rv)),float);

printf("%12.4f",mg);

if(mg<tol or numIter>=max) then

goto(label_6);

else

numIter:=numIter+1;

fi;

v1:=x1pt+t*rv[1];

v2:=x2pt+t*rv[2];

newt:=evalf(subs({x1=v1,x2=v2},f1));

numfeval:=numfeval+1;

lam:=fsolve(diff(newt,t)=0,t,maxsols=1);

nv1:=evalf(subs({t=lam},v1));

nv2:=evalf(subs({t=lam},v2));

printf(" (%8.4f,%8.4f)%13.4f\n",x1pt,x2pt,lam);

x1pt:=nv1;

x2pt:=nv2;

goto(label_7);

label_6;

printf("\n\n-----------------------------------------");

printf("---------------------------------------------");

printf("\n\n Approximate Solution: ");

printf(" (%8.4f,%8.4f)\n",x1pt,x2pt);

Fvalue:=evalf(subs(x1=x1pt,x2=x2pt,f));

printf(" Maximum Functional Value: ");

printf("%21.4f",Fvalue);

printf("\n Number gradient evaluations:");

printf("%22d",numgeval);

printf("\n Number function evaluations:");

printf("%22d",numfeval);

printf("\n\n-----------------------------------------");

printf("---------------------------------------------");

end:

hi.

According to the fhgure attaceh how i can gain the equation (2-27) . I write the equation (2-26) in maple but I couldnot to gain that result.

If possible to reach equation via maple?

Thanks

diff.mw
 

Download diff.mw

why pdsolve does not work?

Q and alpha are constant. I want to find f(x,y).

Thanks
 

Download PLATE.mw